American Journal of Ophthalmology 208: 305-312, 2019Ĭomparative study of Acrysof ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lenses +4.00 D and +3.00 D: visual performance and wavefront error. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 40(10): 1625-1632, 2014Ĭost-Effectiveness Analysis of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Compared to Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery. Multifocal toric intraocular lenses versus multifocal intraocular lenses combined with peripheral corneal relaxing incisions to correct moderate astigmatism. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 44(5): 615-622, 2018 Journal of Refractive Surgery 24(3): 308-311, 2008Īssessment of straylight and the modulation transfer function of intraocular lenses with centrally localized opacification associated with the intraocular injection of gas. Wavefront measurements of diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses in an artificial eye. Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye: Point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye: point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. Modulationsübertragungsfunktion und Kontrast-empdfindlichkeit refraktiver Mehrzonenmultifokallinsen - Modulation transfer function and contrast sensitivity of multizonal refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 36(4): 557-562, 2010 Ophthalmologe 90(4): 343-347, 1993Ĭorrelation between optics quality of multifocal intraocular lenses and visual acuity: tolerance to modulation transfer function decay. Modulation transfer function and contrast sensitivity of multizonal refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Modulation transfer function and pupil size in multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses in vitro. Both diffractive IOLs showed similar spherical aberration, which was significantly better with the full-diffractive IOL Tecnis than with the refractive IOL ReZoom. Diffractive IOLs studied presented similar MTF curves for a 5 mm pupil diameter. Similar MTF curves were found for the aspheric multifocal IOL Tecnis and the spheric multifocal IOL ReSTOR, and both performed better than the multifocal IOL ReZoom in a 5 mm pupil (P<0.001 at all spatial frequencies). Spherical aberration was significantly higher in the ReZoom group (P=0.007). The ReSTOR group provided better uncorrected near visual acuity than the ReZoom group (P<0.001), but similar to the Tecnis group. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was similar in all three groups of multifocal IOLs. The comparison of MTF and aberration between the intraocular lenses was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Dunn test when necessary. Forty eyes received the diffractive ReSTOR (Alcon), 40 eyes received the refractive ReZoom (Advanced Medical Optics) and 40 eyes, the Tecnis ZM900 (Advanced Medical Optics). Uncorrected distance and near visual acuity, and wavefront analysis including MTF curves (iTrace aberrometer, Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX, USA) were measured in 60 patients after bilateral IOL implantation with 6 months of follow-up. This was a prospective, interventional, comparative, nonrandomized clinical study. To evaluate wavefront performance and modulation transfer function (MTF) in the human eye after the implantation of diffractive or refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 58(2): 109-113 Wavefront analysis and modulation transfer function of three multifocal intraocular lenses
0 kommentar(er)
